‘One Platform Going Rogue Is Enough to Break the Monopoly’

[ad_1]

Monday, Fox News Channel’s Tucker Carlson praised Twitter’s purchase by billionaire Elon Musk calling the announcement good news and a defeat of the so-called Big Tech oligarchy’s stranglehold on speech.

According to Carlson, while Twitter is the smallest player on the social media stage, there is at least one platform for dissent.

CARLSON: A good news shows. You don’t get those too often. It’s April 25th, 2022. Elon Musk bought Twitter today. That means that Twitter, henceforth, will be privately held. Elon Musk will determine what is allowed on the platform.

Now, why is this significant? Not because it signals the sudden arrival of oligarchy as you’re hearing now. It’s too late for that; oligarchy is already here. Every major tech company is already controlled by billionaires. That’s been the case for a long time, so this is nothing new.

The reason today’s sale of Twitter is big news, the reason it could turn out to be a pivot point in our history, is that Elon Musk does not agree with the rest of the billionaires in the tech business.

Unlike the leaders of Facebook, Google, Apple, Amazon, Elon Musk believes in free speech. He thinks everyone should be allowed to talk, including people who disagree with him.

“I hope that even my worst critics remain on Twitter,” Musk wrote today on his new platform. “Because that is what free speech means.” Now, that sounds like an entirely American sentiment, but in this atmosphere, that is a revolutionary posture.

Of the five companies that control the flow of virtually all information that is consumed by the citizens of this country, Twitter is by far the smallest of the group, but it doesn’t matter. One platform going rogue is enough to break the monopoly. That means you now have real options for expressing yourself.

Going forward if you disagree with the administration’s latest directive, you get to say so out loud to an audience. So, they’re up there every day from the podium, the biggest megaphone in the world commanding you to hate this or that group, lecturing you about who is good and who is evil as if you’re a child and have no right to decide for yourself these things, the basic things.

But before today, you didn’t have a right to express your disagreement in public. If you had an opposing opinion or even more dangerous than that, if you had countervailing facts that undermine their storyline, the tech companies would shut you down immediately. It happened to us. It happened to a lot of people, most of whom you’ve never heard of. Never hearing about those people was the whole point of shutting them down. But that’s over.

After today, you’ll be able to post your dissent in a place where other people might have a reasonable chance of seeing it. In other words, you will have a chance to change other people’s minds just like the white House does every day.

So, you just became a little more powerful. The people already in charge just became a little less powerful. It’s that simple, and it’s that profound.

Of course, it could change. It’s possible that at some point Elon Musk will decide he doesn’t really want dissenting views on Twitter. That could happen. Elon Musk can do whatever he wants, just as Jeff Bezos and Mark Zuckerberg can do whatever they want and often do.

This is the cost to the rest of us of living under a political system that is so dysfunctional it cannot even guarantee the core freedoms it promises its own citizens and free speech is the first on that list. Why? Because democracy depends upon free speech and the irony is, if you’d like to save democracy, you are forced to look outside the democratic system in order to do it.

At this point, you have no choice but to put your hopes in the good intentions of an eccentric billionaire. There’s no other option because no one else is coming to the rescue. So, in the case of Elon Musk, we will see how this turns out, but for now, Musk’s purchase of Twitter is the single biggest political development since Donald Trump’s election in 2016. It is certainly the most threatening challenge to the corrupt and incompetent leadership of this country.

Now, that may not be obvious to everyone yet, but the people in charge certainly understand it. Here was scene inside Twitter’s headquarters in San Francisco when the Musk deal was announced.

[VIDEO CLIP PLAYS]

CARLSON: Sorry, wrong tape. But the very same idea. What you just saw was the collective grief of people who thought they were going to be fully in charge, who totally believed they’d be able to rule without limit. You’re watching those people learn that actually other people get to talk, too, and that realization is crushing to them. It’s the one thing they fear and that tells you everything about why those people should never be near power.

People who want a monopoly on speech and thought, hate Elon Musk not because he’s a racist, he is not; but because they can’t control him. They hate him because he persists in saying things like this:

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

CHRIS ANDERSON, HEAD, TED TALK: But why make that offer?

ELON MUSK, CEO, TESLA: So, well, I think it’s very important for there to be an inclusive arena for free speech. My strong, intuitive sense is that having a public platform that is maximally trusted and broadly inclusive is extremely important to the future of civilization.

ANDERSON: But you’ve described yourself —

MUSK: I don’t care about the economics at all.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

CARLSON: So free speech is extremely important to civilization. Are you triggered by that? It’s often hard to know who is on what side, so much lying. Who are the good guys and who are the bad guys? Well, here’s a very clear, simple, and unerring test. Who are the tyrants? They’re anyone who is bothered by the idea that other people might get to talk. That is an unfailing test. It’s 100 percent accurate.

Would you allow people who disagree with you to talk? If you wouldn’t, you are a tyrant and tonight the tyrants are grieving.

In Congress, Democrats made a last ditch bid to use their power to intimidate Elon Musk into backing off. Congresswoman Katherine Clark of Connecticut wrote this quote: “If they can afford to buy Twitter, they can afford to pay their fair share in taxes. Retweet: If you’re ready to support Joe Biden’s billionaire minimum income tax.” Exclamation point.

But it’s funny, didn’t “National Review” write a bunch of pieces the other day saying it was wrong for Ron DeSantis to use his power in Florida to punish a company? I wonder if they’re as upset about this.

All of a sudden, Democrats are calling for any kind of higher taxes on the big companies that fund their campaigns. Why? Because here is one that may not fund their campaigns.

Congresswoman Bonnie Watson Coleman wrote this, “If you can buy a major social media platform, you can pay your fair share in taxes. Tax The Rich.” Haven’t heard that from the left in a while. Why are they so mad? Because their monopoly on speech and information, the ability to control what you believe, has been broken.

So once again, they’re resorting to force to get you to shut up. This is not an attack on Elon Musk. They’re not going to tax him into poverty. He’s the world’s richest man. This is an attack on you and your right to speak freely, to express your conscience in public.

But for once, it is not working and the media are infuriated. They’re profoundly threatened by a free internet and so they’re panicked. Watch.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

JOY REID, MSNBC HOST: Elon Musk is the new power at the social media giant and he is foaming the runways for the return of the trolls.

JASON JOHNSON, MSNBC COMMENTATOR: This is happening in the background of Elon Musk saying, “Basically, I want to buy Twitter so I can open it up and turn it into Gab and let Donald Trump back.”

So, there are real consequences to allowing anybody to run these internet sites and say whatever it is they want.

ANAND GIRIDHARADAS, PUBLISHER, THE.INK: And Elon Musk is the fox coming into the henhouse and it is shameful that Twitter, which has a fiduciary obligation, I would think, to protect people who actually use it, the millions of people who actually use it — did they ask a single woman, a single woman? Was a single woman consulted? Was a single person of color who just uses Twitter, who made the mistake of using Twitter and needs it for their job?

(END VIDEO CLIP)

CARLSON: So Elon Musk is a threat to the weak, say the most privileged and powerful people in our society. Really? Are they really standing up for the weak?

No, the weak are the people who aren’t allowed to say what they really think. Those are the weak and what you just saw are the strong demanding the silence of the weak. Everyone has kind of figured this out, except the people demanding it.

They are so up their own butts that you just heard them say that Twitter has a fiduciary duty to ignore its shareholders, block the deal and continue Twitter’s decline in the market. It doesn’t even make any sense and because it doesn’t, you can be certain you were watching in meltdown.

And of course, at the bottom of the meltdown is always the same charge. “He’s a racist.” Wait for The New York Times piece telling you, “Elon Musk is a racist.”

Shaun King, the fake Black activist on Twitter, wrote this, quote: “At its root. Elon Musk wanting to purchase Twitter is not about left versus right. It’s about white power. The man was raised in apartheid by a white nationalist. He’s upset that Twitter won’t allow white nationalists to target, harass people. That’s his definition of free speech.”

So, you have a fake Black guy attacking Elon Musk because of his parents, right?

So, Musk hasn’t responded point by point to all this and again, there is something a little bit pathetic if you care about democracy and pinning your hopes on one guy, but again, what are our options at this point? So far, Elon Musk has said all the right things.

In a statement this afternoon, announcing his purchase of Twitter, he said this, quote: “Free speech is the bedrock of a functioning democracy and Twitter is the digital town square where matters vital to the future of humanity are debated. I also want to make Twitter better than ever by enhancing the product with new features, making the algorithms open source to increase trust, defeating the spam bots and authenticating all humans. Twitter has tremendous potential. I look forward to working with the company and the community users to unlock it.” End quote.

Now, if that’s even half true, how is it not an improvement over what we currently have, where people are arbitrarily banned depending upon the whims of politicians in charge, where the powerful crush the week to maintain their power? If you think the status quo is better than that, then you’re a tyrant.

[ad_2]